We
the People
6/1/11
“We
the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union,
establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense,
promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to
ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the
United States of America.”
“Ye
shall know the truth…and the truth shall set you free!”
Most people in the United
States don’t realize that the court system is based on a false premise. We mistakenly believe that these courts are
courts of Common Law with
jurisdiction over the common man. The
original intent and purpose of all courts was to elicit justice from the
decisions rendered. There were civil
courts and criminal courts created to deal with separate areas of
jurisdiction. Criminal acts as well as
civil disputes were tried in common law courts.
Common law is a trial by jury with the jury establishing the law of the
case and the punishment. If the jury decided that the law was unjust they had
the right to “Jury Nullification” wherein they could nullify an existing
law. The judge in a common law trial was
simply in the courtroom to make sure the proper papers were presented to the
jury. The jury had all of the power in
the courtroom and no common law decision could ever be overturned by the judge
or by another court. All other courts
were to be inferior to the common law court—including the Supreme Court.
Unfortunately, the court
systems began changing in 1926. With the
creation of rules, regulations and codes that were signed by the Congress, the
President and the B.A.R. (British Accredited Regency), the BAR was creating its
own private administrative procedures for corporations. Thus, the BAR supplanted the judicial system
as the BAR (by its obvious association with Great Britain) is treasonous to the
United States. Their use of Greek and
Latin terms in law and the habit of changing definitions and usage of common
words is intentional. The intent is to
confound and confuse the general public and to hide the treason they are
implementing, so that members of the public are forced to hire a lawyer out of
frustration rather than try to represent themselves in our “fictional courts of
law.” Ninety-eight percent of the
officials in public office are lawyers and these so-called representatives set
policy and create the laws that govern this society. Do you really think anyone is going to get a
fair trial when the Judge, Prosecuting and
Defense Attorneys who are the “Officers of the Court” are all members of the BAR Association? Isn’t that called a “Conflict of Interest?”
Actually the conspiracy to
bankrupt the United States started clear back during the Revolutionary War and
continued through the Civil War and into both World Wars. ALL WARS ARE INTENDED TO BANKRUPT SOCIETIES
AND BRING THEM TO THEIR KNEES AND UNDER THE CONTROL OF THEIR
SLAVE-MASTERS. Note: The Federal and
State Governments are bankrupt, NOT THE PEOPLE!
And to remedy this status, the Governors of the several states pledged
(loaned) the Lives, Liberty, Future Labor, and all Private Property “of the
people” to the bankrupt Federal and State governments as surety for the
National Debt they created during the wars.
Thus, as the lender, we the people
are the creditors and our bankrupt government is the debtor.
In other words—the government is
indebted to us not we to them! But
we must be willing to stand up for our sovereign rights and not be used for
their “collateral damage.”
In 1946, the Administrative Procedures Act forever
changed the courts of government for the American people. Roosevelt called it the fourth branch of government.
This act brought all branches
of government and municipalities (except for the counties) under administrative
codes, rules and regulations. This in
reality established each branch and municipality (which are mere corporations)
as an independent nation with each having their own codes, rules and
regulations. All corporations make up
their own rules for the purpose of collecting revenue (for their debt).
Laws are established by the
legislature through the passage of bills signed into law by the legislature and
the governor/president. Remember—rules,
regulations and codes are NOT law, they are an abrogation of the law and only
corporations are subject to them. These
so-called “Commercial Courts” have only one function, and that is to
administrate and enforce the Government’s corporate policy pertaining to
commerce and those engaged in commerce for the purpose of collecting
revenue. These laws must not abrogate the rights of the people or the supreme law of
the land—The Constitution—or they are considered “Unconstitutional” and can be
appealed under “Color of Law”.
Federal law provides that it is
a crime to violate the Constitutional Rights of a citizen under the “Color of
Law.” One violation of Constitutional
Rights is the right to a “speedy trial by a jury of one’s peers.” Most court proceedings drag on and on
exceeding the 70-day limit provided by the Constitution as a “speedy
trial.” This extracts from the taxpayer
enormous amounts of revenue that could be used for beneficial public
programs. Other violations of human,
civil and constitutional rights are committed during “unlawful arrests.” Public
officials such as police officers (policy enforcers) can be charged for this
crime and can be held personally liable for any civil damages. Attempting to coerce or deceive a citizen to
surrender his Constitutional Rights is a Federal Crime! Federal Courts have found that ignorance of
the law is no excuse. Also under codes
18 USC §242,
18 USC §245
and 42 USC §1983 any officer of the court can be arrested, held
personally liable, and sued for damages, as well as the officer’s security bond
company or agency.
All court cases are contract
offers so established by Erie Railroad vs. Tompkins. This case concluded that where there was no
contract, there was no case. This meant
that the only cases courts could hear had to involve contracts. All contracts must have the following elements to be a legal binding contract: 1)
Offer 2) Acceptance (with full disclosure and meeting of minds) 3) Exchange for
value. (Farnsworth Law of Contracts)
The
first offer of contract will come from an arresting officer asking
you to sign a citation. That is why they
tell you that this is not an
admittance of guilt or innocence but merely a SIGNED CONTRACT THAT YOU WILL
APPEAR IN COURT! Instead of signing the
contract to appear in court, turn the ticket over and write on the back of it: I
DO NOT CONSENT! I DO NOT ACCEPT THIS
OFFER! SIGNED UNDER DURESS,
INTIMIDATION, COERCION, THREAT, FEAR! ALL RIGHTS RESERVED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE! U.C.C. 1-207, 308. They cannot force you to sign a contract or
they are in violation of United States Constitutional codes 242, 245, and
42-1983.
Did you know that a car stop
could be deemed as an arrest, and detainment an imprisonment? If the arresting officer fails to produce a
warrant and/or supporting evidence to prove a crime has been committed, and
then proceeds with the arrest and detainment—it is a false arrest. You certainly have the right to argue with
the police officer if he doesn’t know the law and threatens to arrest you and
throw you in jail; but as everyone is aware, police routinely ignore and
violate this law. However, if they act
in a belligerent way, and without due respect to your rights as a sovereign,
live, flesh-and-blood person (never
use the word “citizen” as this identifies you as a “corporate fiction” and not
as a free man or woman) you may want to talk to their supervisor and warn them
of their liability. (Always ask for a
witness to the proceedings and memorize the arresting officers’ names.)
The officer is personally
liable for any misdeeds during an arrest.
Their protection of “sovereign immunity” only covers “discretionary”
acts where the officer has a choice among reasonable alternatives. Sovereign immunity does not cover
“ministerial” acts such as executing an arrest warrant. Nor does it cover situations in which the
officer exceeds his lawful duty (e.g. acting as judge and jury, use of
excessive force, destroying exonerating evidence). Did you know that if you sue for false arrest
(or false imprisonment), the arrest is presumed to be false? (The arrestee has a right to be presumed
innocent until proven otherwise.) Demand
their Indemnity or Security Bond to indemnify you for any injury they may cause
to you, your private property interest and/or your private rights.
The
second offer of contract may come as a ticket, judgment or warrant
received in the mail. Immediately after
opening, place documents in a new envelope.
On a blank sheet of paper write or type the following:
These enclosed documents were
inadvertently received and opened by mistake.
These enclosed document(s) appear to be (traffic ticket, court order, judgment) are not
understandable or recognizable under the penalty of False Personification must be returned. The enclosure herein contains the
aforementioned and misdirected documents; as there is not enough information
disclosed to form a responsive answer, said documents are being returned
forthwith.
Address the new envelope with
sender’s address; also use this address as the return address. DO NOT USE YOUR NAME OR ADDRESS ON THIS
ENVELOPE. Do not use any headings or
signature on your response. Do not rebut
the issue or address anything in their documents. The object is to return the presentment of
contract in the most neutral, non-committal manner possible. You are simply returning the unwanted presentments.
(You may want to send a “courtesy copy” anonymously to the court.) By returning the offer of contract back to
issuer you accomplish three things: 1) Irrefutable proof of refusal to contract
(denying presumption of consent). 2) Deny the court service of process. 3)
Avoid appearance altogether, thus depriving court of jurisdiction.
The
third offer of contract is your appearance in court. Appearance
in court grants jurisdiction. DO NOT
COMMIT ACCEPTANCE OF CONTRACT BY YOUR APPEARANCE IN COURT! APPEARANCE DENOTES ACCEPTANCE! Appearance
is defined in Black’s Law Dictionary as: “A coming into court as party to a
suit, either in person or by attorney, whether as plaintiff or defendant. The formal proceeding by which a defendant
submits him/herself to the jurisdiction of the court. The voluntary submission to a court’s
jurisdiction.” Stay out of court if at all possible! You are either a Sovereign Freeman or a slave
to their system. We are now operating
under Public Policy, not Public Law or Common Law. There are no laws to uphold and no
Constitutional courts to hear them in!
We are operating under stare
decisis which means the latest court case is the new law. They will use this to their advantage and will ignore it if it is to your advantage!
The
fourth offer of contract will come from an attorney trying to
contract you to be a “third party.”
Whether represented by your own attorney or by a court-appointed
attorney, you now have no voice and everything you say will be held against you. Your odds of winning the case when the court
comes against you are nearly always zero!
When you give Power of Attorney to the court/an attorney, by contract
you are actually saying that you are
incompetent to handle your affairs. Once you enter their jurisdiction you cannot
extricate yourself for the duration of that contract. You may try to do so via an affidavit of
mistake, but the court will most likely carry out the contract to the judgment. All you can do is reject and return all
motions as motions are used to write the contract. When the final judgment is rendered (by the
opposing attorney) and signed by the judge, you must reject and return within
72 hours if you do not agree with the contract.
You do have the option to fire
your lawyer or court-appointed attorney for any
reason and defend yourself in court.
Unfortunately you are considered by the court a “second-class citizen”
as you don’t understand their “rules of engagement.” You don’t know how to fill out their
complicated legal forms; speak their complex lawyer “lingo”; or have the
knowledge of court rules and procedures.
This is totally unconstitutional under the First Amendment as it denies
the average person access to the courts; which are supposed to belong to the
people. Instead all courts are owned by
international lawyers (traitors). As a
“victim” in a courtroom trying to bring out the truth or exercise a
constitutional right, the lawyer-judge will deem anything out-of-line an
“outburst” and perhaps charge you with contempt of court. The only other option is to appear in court
(but not within the courtroom “bar” parameters) so you will not be guilty of
non-appearance. You can then simply hand
your lawyer or the judge an “affidavit of mistake” and walk out of court hoping
that a county clerk or court officer won’t try to “force” you into another
contract.
An “affidavit of mistake”
contains the following elements:
- Court’s
name, state or county
- Title
in caps such as: NOTARIZED SWORN AFFIDAVIT; JUDICIAL NOTICE OF PETITION TO
STRIKE; ALL CONTRACTS CANCELLED; MANDATORY JUDICIAL NOTICE AND DELARATON;
NOTICE OF REVOCATION OF SIGNATURE, POWER OF ATTORNEY AND CONSENT; ETC.
- In
your own words making it as precise as possible state the following:
I, your name in
lower-case letters an actual live, flesh-and-blood person, hereby
declare that I do not, did not, never intended, and never will intend to be in
servitude (economic or otherwise) to any corporate government. Therefore any and all contracts (presumed or
otherwise) are null and void for the following reasons: 1) No full disclosures
of content of contract and its ramifications. 2) No valid “acceptance” due to
misrepresentation, misunderstanding, undue coercion or force; therefore there
was no meeting of minds. 3) Failure of just compensation (per Fifth Amendment).
- Date
and notarize a copy to give to the court, and send another copy certified
mail to the District Attorney’s office.
CAUTION
This is a do-it-yourself
process. There are no guarantees. Every situation is different (circumstances,
people, events) and there’s no standard approach. Worse yet, we’re dealing with people who
don’t abide by their own laws but do
as they damn well please. This isn’t Rule of Law, it’s Rule of Man;
therefore no matter how prepared you are or how much due diligence you do on
your part, it may not mean a rat’s ass
to those who are tyrannical terrorists.
But what other choice do you have? Give up all of your God-given rights to their
system of injustice? Perhaps it’s time
to join the new “people’s republic” and sign a new “Declaration of
Independence.” I have already. It’s never
too late to reclaim our unalienable rights to our freedom and liberty. Here are a few quotes from George Orwell, who
saw it all coming:
"If liberty means anything
at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear."
"Speaking the Truth in
times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act."
"Political language. . .
is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an
appearance of solidity to pure wind."
"War is a way of
shattering to pieces, or pouring into the stratosphere, or sinking in the
depths of the sea, materials which might otherwise be used to make the masses
too comfortable, and hence, in the long run, too intelligent."
Declaration of
Independence
IN CONGRESS, July 4, 1776.
The unanimous Declaration of
the thirteen united States of America,
When in the Course of human
events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands
which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the
earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of
Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires
that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be
self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their
Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and
the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are
instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the
governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these
ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute
new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its
powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety
and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established
should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all
experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils
are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they
are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing
invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute
Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government,
and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient
sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains
them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present
King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all
having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these
States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.
Written
by Janae Thorne-Bird
All Rights Reserved
No comments:
Post a Comment